Contoh Program Oop Php Example

Contoh Program Oop Php Example

Installing Phpbb Theme Programs. Oct 10, 2017  Contoh CRUD OOP PHP, Example CRUD PHP OOP, Simple Code CRUD OOP PHP.

Download Software Install Xsl Php Extension here. I've been using PHP on and off for years, mostly just writing simple, one to five page sites/scripts, etc, with the most complicated application I ever wrote being a fairly basic webcomic management system. Of course, with such simple/small applications, I've always written them in a procedural style. I'd like to eventually move on to writing larger, more complicated PHP applications, and I've constantly heard that OOP is the way to go for such things, as it's supposedly more maintainable and easier to write in the long term. So I've looked up tutorials and guides, and I have a fairly basic understanding about how to write, call, and manage classes already. However, I'm having some difficulty understating how OOP is practical or necessary. All of the examples and tutorials I've seen so far basically show how to use OOP and what it does, but I've yet to see anything to help me determine where OOP should be used.

Download Index.php For Xampp more. Like, is everything on a page supposed to be an object? Or am I just supposed to create objects when code get repetitive, and otherwise follow a procedural flow? I was wondering if anyone knew of either any tutorials on designing a fully functional, yet practical PHP OOP application, or a semi-basic app that was written in an OOP style (like a blog or something, not a complex CMS or that)? Simply put, I learn best by seeing how things are put together, how they work, etc. I can spend days continuing to read blog posts and introductory tutorials on why OOP is good and why I should use it, but I'd really just have a much better understanding of it if I could see it actually in use, if that makes sense.

You are a long way after the OOP revolution. OOP was the 'next big thing' in programming in the 1990s. That era is long over. It's no longer the shiny object (pun intended) in the room and while it is still useful and used, the number of people using it and the number of people promoting it is tiny compared to what it used to be. OOP is generally pretty slow but helps people to think differently about programs and organize them. I rarely do OOP today. I'm a deeply trained OOP programmer and it has a lot of value.

But the 'everything should be objects' era is over. JoeyH3 wrote: All of the examples and tutorials I've seen so far basically show how to use OOP and what it does, but I've yet to see anything to help me determine where OOP should be used.

Like, is everything on a page supposed to be an object? Or am I just supposed to create objects when code get repetitive, and otherwise follow a procedural flow?

That's procedural programming with functions, just putting repetition into functions. In theory with OOP, you would put every into an object.

Try Java for a few days. Java forces everything to be an object. It will change your thought process. JoeyH3 wrote: Edit:  I missed the last paragraph of your post, where you addressed exactly what I said. While having self-referencing could be nice, is there any standard or best practice that says functions shouldn't be named like that? No, but with large projects it can become pretty bad, so for example a really old project I had functions with names like: accounting_receivable_invoices_items_add(.) But now i'd have a name space for Accounting Receivable Invoices and have a class name Items, and in there have add().